After all, we already have enough interruptions, even in metropolitan areas. When thinking of the mobile communication think things moving. However, what we are not going to do about all this is to create a huge fixed antenna system. For an increasingly rapid communication-something we all want more power, can be integrated into the device, which costs money, or reduce the size of the "cell" (the geographic area served by a cellular tower signal) of the antenna and the surrounding things that can hear the antenna.
Today, the cell size is about 50 miles. When an antenna responsive to all cars and mobile users in a radius of 50 miles, may not offer very quickly. You will have to be commensurate with what you have. But suppose that instead of an antenna that serves a radius of 50 kilometers, several antennas are talking at people and cars equivalent of a block. You can be on telephone poles or utility poles a few blocks away from each other. Then you can have a huge bandwidth and accommodate many people using small wireless devices with small batteries. So a conversation could be maintained for an hour while traveling through several cells, although that would be in urban centers and quasi-urban. Moving to rural areas or deep oceans of the world will not have that. There will always be to rely on other means such as a satellite, which also is wireless, though slower, but at least it is possible to reach the remotest parts.
The network of the future will not be 100 percent wireless. There will be plenty of online networks. And fiber lines to stationary antennas. And coaxial cables. And there will be a multitude of transmission lines in urban or semi-urban areas because they offer speed. Economical, and connects very well with a location connected by line and another. And secondly, there will be a high volume of wireless communication with local scope. And satellites for remote parts of the world.
Already there is considerable controversy about the impact of cell towers and wireless transmissions on the health of people. Do you really think that communities that technology will be disseminated as widely as you propose?
- I'm not suggesting we adopt that model, I am simply pointing out that that's where we are heading. I do not see that the protests of the communities are greater than the desire for self-gratification and the desire for "toys" with the entertaining. Do we know that these things are dangerous? If we know, this is why we choose to establish governments and regulatory institutions to protect them. However, after 50 years in the electronics business, we do not have one piece of information that tells us that the business of mobile phone is dangerous to our health.
Currently less than 50 percent of the world's population uses the Internet.
